Skip to main content

Sachin Bansal’s Exit form Flipkart- Lessons for Founders




US retailer Wallmart Inc. acquired a 77% stake in India’s largest online retailer for almost US$ 16 billions in its biggest acquisition to date. With this acquisition, brings an end to journey of Poster Boy- Sachin Bansal &  Flipkart.
Though it s a moment of ecstasy and celebrations for startups especially Flipkart, there are few questions which must have to looked seriously by the Founders/Startups.


Sachin Bansal- Exit from Flipkart-
Sachin was involved in talks with Wallmart from the beginning and it was expected that he could get a bigger role at Flipkart after the sale then the Executive Chairman. However, a last minute disagreement with Lee Fixel and Krishnamurthy over hos role and rights after the sale led to a bitter ouster. It’s the final affirmation of who controls the Company.
Sachin being a Founder of Flipkart wanted stronger rights such as preferential ‘founder rights’ & guarantees that he would have  a lot more say in Flipkart’s operations, however this was strongly refuted by Krishnamurthy who later on been retained as CEO by Wallmart.
Since the start of Flipkart, Sachin’s life has revolved around it. For him every conversation is about Flipkart & everything is about Flipkart.” – Abhishek Goyal, Co-founder of Traxcn and early investor of Flipkart.
It has also been confirmed that with this ouster, there would be certain restriction on Sachin professional life as part of his exit from Flipkart:
1.       Restriction on starting any business that directly or indirectly competes with Flipkart for a minimum period of 18 months;
2.       Not to make nay investments or take management role in any competing business for atleast next 36 months.
At first Sachin Bansal is been forcefully exit from Flipkart and now cannot do any business as per his expertise.

Questions for Founders:
1.       Why couldn’t Binny Bansal or Sachin Bansal be able to stop the unenviable exit of Sachin Bansal from Flipkart?
2.       Sachin Bansal is the most important energy and reason for the Flipkart’s success. However, his exit form Flipkart shows that it’s the investor who takes all decisions and not the Founders. In Indian ecosystem, this kind of incident had happened earlier also- Forced exit of Mr. Rahul Yadav from Housing.com on disagreement with investor- Sequoia Capital.  Do this undue advantage can be checked at the beginning by the Founder’s themselves?
3.       The restrictive clause after the exit would make Sachin as spectator for a time period and there is a possibility that he may loose his spot in business world or atleast he would lag behind his competitive founders and may have to start fresh. Is there any way out for Founders to protect themselves or are they on the mercy of investors?
Way out-
At the time of execution of idea and starting of startup journey, most of the Founders are focused on the success of their startups, however, they forget to protect themselves. And, by the time their startup reached to the milestones as desired by the Founders, they need more partners to grow, especially investors and at alter stage of startup when investor join hands with Founders, they are very straight forward objective- to make more profit and to secure the money even at the cost of Founders. Though, investors have rights to protect their investment, does this protection extent beyond the point that for more profit, Founders can be forced out of their own startup and that to without their own consent.
Now, with growing awareness, most of the Founders are executing Founders Agreement, which not only protect the Founder’s interest but also enable them to negotiate the rights with investors instead of being cowed.  Therefore, it is very necessary to build a solid foundation before taking next step with your business. And, when you are having more than one founder for a startup, its wiser to execute a Founders Agreement among themselves. It will act as baseline for the relationship among the Co-Founders during the high & low of their professional journey.
In similar situation like of Sachin Bansal, Ola’s Founder, Bhavish Aggarwal had acted smartly and blocked his rights from the very beginning through Founders Agreement and the same has been agreed in the Investors Agreement.
To put it simply Founders Agreement is an agreement between founders of a company on number of issues they may face. It categorically states what is expected out of them and how decisions will be made.
There can be no perfect timing but one can say the sooner the better, but late is better than never. A good rule of thumb for when to think about a founders’ agreement is that point at which you start thinking about a company instead of merely an idea. If you have passed that point and have not yet created a founders’ agreement, better late than never.
As an old proverb -“Prevention is better than cure”, it would be wiser for Founder’s to execute a Founder’s Agreement which should govern the followings:
1.       Founders’ Objectives;
2.       Relationship & Obligation of each Founders;
3.       Decision making powers;
4.       Investment & contributions;
5.       Equity Holdings & Entrenchment Rights;
6.       Limitation & liabilities;
7.       Protection of intellectual property  & IP assignment
8.       Vesting Clause for the shares of the Founders;
9.       Appointment & removal of Key Managerial Personnel;
10.  Entry of Investor/third parties in the Company;
11.  Exit Mechanism;
12.  Non-Compete;
As a startups grows, you may discover that there are differences among co-founders on the future of startup or its mission. So, its better to execute a Founders Agreement inclusive of the terms mentioned herewith to create a mutually accepted terms for resolve the differences and grow together.
For any clarification, please feel free to connect with us at admin@equicorplegal.com / 08448824659.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFC)

A Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) is a  company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of loans and advances, acquisition of shares stock/bonds/debentures/securities issued by Government or local authority or other securities of like marketable nature, leasing, hire-purchase, insurance business, chit business but does not include any institution whose principal business is that of agriculture activity, industrial activity, sale/purchase/construction of immovable property. A non-banking institution which is a company and which has its principal business of receiving deposits under any scheme or arrangement or any other manner, or lending in any manner is also a non-banking financial company (Residuary non-banking company). Advantages of NBFC a)it can provide loans and credit facilities, b)it can trade in  money market instruments c)it can do wealth management such as Managing portfolios of stocks and shares d)it can underwrite stock and shares and oth…

Nidhi Companies in India

This article enumerates the brief transaction procedure involved in the establishment of a Nidhi Company and the laws relating to Nidhi Company in force in India. It shall be noted that the activities described hereunder covers various relevant legislations, regulations and rules, for the time being in force in India and the legal entity has to obtain approval/register itself with Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”).
Preface In the Indian financial sector, Nidhi Company refers to any mutual benefit society notified by the MCA. They are created mainly for cultivating the habit of thrift and savings amongst its members. The amount of business conducted by Nidhi Companies is not as big as commercial banks or deposit taking Non-Banking Finance Companies. Nidhi Companies are highly localized and mostly single office institutions. They are also referred to as mutual benefit societies, because they accept deposits and give loans to only their own members; and membership is limited to individ…

Types of Companies under New Companies Act-2013

With new testament of Corporate law in force has introduced several different types of companies with special features.
ONE PERSON COMPANY (OPC) One Person Company is defined in Sub- Section 62 of Section 2 of The Companies Act, 2013, which reads as follows: 'One Person Company means a company which has only one member' It shall also be important to note that Section 3 classifies OPC as a Private Company for all the legal purposes with only one member. All the provisions related to the private company are applicable to an OPC, unless otherwise expressly excluded. ØOnly a natural person who is an Indian citizen and resident in India- üshall be eligible to incorporate a One Person Company; üshall be a nominee for the sole member of a One Person Company. ØNo person shall be eligible to incorporate more than a One Person Company or become nominee in more than one such company. ØNo minor shall become member or nominee of the One Person Company or can hold share with beneficial interest. ØT…

SEBI VS PACL: Trouble in Paradise

In its biggest-ever crackdown on a large-scale money pooling scheme estimated at nearly Rs. 50,000 crore (twice the amount to be recover from SAHARA group), regulator SEBI has ordered  Pearls Agrotech Corporation Limited (“PACL”) to refund investors within three months and wind up operations. SEBI had found PACL violating Collective Investment Scheme Regulations by mobilizing the money without being registered with the regulator, SEBI. Besides, closure of PACL operations, SEBI  is initiating further proceedings against PACL and its nine promoters and directors for fraudulent and unfair trade practices, as also for violation of SEBI's CIS Regulations, among others, as per a direction from the Supreme Court. At present, it is being estimated that PACL has more than 58.5 million customers, more than twice the 22 million demat accounts in the entire country and has paid commission of
Rs 7,893.8 crore up to March 2012  to more than its 8 lakh agents who works as network of chain system fo…

NBFC & Companies Act 2013 w.r.t. issue of Debentures

With the new testament of corporate law, Companies Act, 2013 to be effective from April 01, 2014, NBFC are facing lack of oxygen supply for their survival as to ensure that debenture issuances did not trespass into the domain of public deposits and were beginning to understand that optionally convertible debentures market will die out slowly that the rules have thrown language open to interpretation. Section 71 of the Companies Act, 2013 along with the rules implies that the debenture issuances have to be secured by specific moveable and immoveable properties. NBFCs may face a rocky time in finding these specific moveable and immoveable properties for issue of secured debenture.  Section 71 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that – 1.A company may issue debentures with an option to convert such debentures into shares, either wholly or partly at the time of redemption: Provided that the issue of debentures with an option to convert such debentures into shares, wholly or partly, shall be ap…

Nidhi Companies Rules 2014- An analysis w.r.t. Nidhi Company Registration

“Nidhi is a company formed with the exclusive object of cultivating the habit of thrift, savings and functioning for the mutual benefit of members by receiving deposits only from individuals enrolled as members and by lending only to individuals, also enrolled as members” -Section 406, Companies Act, 2013 & Companies Rules 2014
Nidhi Company are registered or formed only for the benefit for its members only, an outsider i.e. who is not the member of the Nidhi Company is not allowed to deposit any money or doing any kind of business with the concerned Nidhi Company. In this article we will analyze the impact of Nidhi Companies Rules 2014 on the registration of Nidhi Company Incorporation of Nidhi Company i)A Nidhi Company to be incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) shall be a public company and with a minimum paid up equity share capital of five lakh rupees; ii)On and after the commencement of Companies Act, 2013, no Nidhi Company shall issue preference shares; iii)Except as…

SEBI VS SAHARA

In Sahara Desert- Distress Hours Once upon a time, Sahara’s Subrarta Roy- a friend to all who came calling-whether a matinee idol in his 80s or a sports star in her teens, self bestowed title- “Sahara Shri”- the sponsor of the Indian cricket team and a group headed by a colourful, flamboyant CEO hobnobbing with Bollywood stars and cowbelt politicianscould boast of having friends in high places. Today in this distress hours, there seems to be few people who he can turn to in his hour of distress. For the sleepy Lucknow of the 1990s whose favourite past-time seemed to be reminiscing the city’s long gone glory days, Subrata Roy Sahara brought a cash of heavy bling and some more. Sahara has stayed afloat for more than 35 years despite repeated regulatory onslaughts. The first setback was in the late '90s when RBI slashed the discretionary investment powers of its finance firm. The next blow came in 2006 when its depository services firm had to be shut down. The big jolt came in 2008 whe…