Skip to main content

GST- Impact on Ecommerce Business/ Online Marketplace

With the rapid growth of e-commerce business & ever evolving regulatory landscape in India had posed a very significant question on the twilight prior to the enforceability of Goods & Service Tax (“GST”) which is to be effective from July 01, 2017- What will be the impact of GST on e-commerce? Unlike, brick & mortar business models, where e-commerce business are working on various different business models, will the impact be same or differ for e-commerce business- a question which is yet struggling to find answer and keep many of the players hinged on the pivot.
Growth of any business is good news for the economy and it’s been expected that to keep the same path of growth, there has to be clarity on taxation matters and ease of doing business. Of lately, there are several apprehensions in business world- Whether GST be a more hurdle rather than a catalyst for growth?
Present issues under VAT & Service Tax faced by Ecommerce business:
1.      Firstly, e-commerce sector dealing in trading of goods have experimented with various business models. Starting with the traditional 'stock-and-sell' model, the e commerce companies have transformed into a multi-model platform over time by introducing 'market place' and / or services model, thereby having to grapple with a more complex tax framework involving VAT / CST, excise, and / or service taxes. However, the indirect tax laws have not been able to recognize and accommodate the evolving business models and hence have become an impediment in the operation of the newer market place or services model.
2.      Secondly, the e-commerce sector is having a hard time categorising their offerings into 'goods' or 'services' for charging either value added tax (VAT) / Central Sales Tax (CST) or service tax. This situation aggravates in the case of digital downloads involving software, music, e-books etc. wherein it becomes challenging to assess whether the transaction is for sale of goods attracting VAT / CST or a provision of service that should be charged to service tax. Both VAT and service tax authorities exercise right over such digital transactions leading to disputes and never-ending litigations.
3.      Thirdly, inter-state movement of goods from one state to another is a nightmare for an e-commerce operator. The requirement of statutory forms, way-bills, road-permits etc. and the recently contemplated imposition of local registration requirements for the e-commerce market place entity by certain States under the VAT / CST legislations for entry or sale of goods into the state has made the inter-state transaction an awkward experience for the sector.
4.      Fourthly, the non-fungible VAT and service tax results in significant non-recoupable tax cost impact for the e-commerce sector.
In addition to the above, the tax laws in India have also failed the e-commerce sector by not providing enough clarity / guidelines on taxation and documentation management for typical e-commerce sector transactions like e-wallet (advance deposits by consumers), cash-on-delivery (payment collected at the door-step of the consumer), gift vouchers, drop-shipment (direct delivery of goods from the e-commerce company vendor to the e-commerce company customer) etc. Absence of specific direction on treatment of the above transactions under various tax legislations has led to diverse practice being adopted by the e commerce sector.

E-commerce sector is here to stay and would be one of the pillars of the Indian economy in the near future. Businesses can thrive and grow only in a tax conducive environment and it is obvious that the above issues cannot continue forever and would need resolution sooner than later. While the e-commerce sector is eagerly looking forward to the upcoming budget to address the concerns and act as a business catalyst for the sector, the Goods & Services Tax (GST) which would replace the current indirect tax regime and expected to be implemented in India from 1 July, 2016, could hold the key to unlock the issues faced by the e-commerce sector.
  1. Standardization of Taxes & Pricing: Under the present tax structure, different states impose different VAT rates on the same goods. For example, Karnataka has a tax rate of 5% on mobile phones, whereas Maharashtra has 13.5%. Online marketplaces list sellers who need to charge lower taxes thus making the product cheaper than local retail prices. The e-tailers often enter exclusive tie-ups to take advantage from tax arbitrage. Post GST, there will be standard tax rates for each product and tax arbitrage will not be possible, bringing e-tailers and offline sellers to the same level in terms of costing and pricing.
  2. Ecommerce & Working Capital: Under GST, online marketplaces will have to deduct 2% tax per transaction while making payments to sellers listed on their portal. This Tax Collected at Source (TCS”) will be handed over as collection towards GST to the government. This rule however does not apply to offline retailers. With TCS, capital will be locked away for periods between 20-50 days depending on the transaction date. The significant impact on the cash flow will force smaller firms to seek additional working capital or ignore the e-commerce marketplace altogether, as it may not offer envisaged convenience and benefits.
  3. Mandatory Registration: While GST registration in normal case is mandatory where turnover is Rs. 20 lakh or more, if a trader wishes to sell through online portals he needs to get registered irrespective of turnover. Merchants without proper registration will be forced to move out of the online system. Now, all sellers will be required to be registered and charge taxes at standard rates creating a level playing ground for all online sellers in terms of product pricing.
  4. Additional Liability on refund & cancellation of orders: Majority of the products sold online carry a return date of 30 days which translates to about 15 - 20 million transactions per month and the returns and refunds for these have to be done with utmost care. The returns are required to be filed monthly now by both parties and refund adjustment will need special attention affecting tax liability.
There are several other issues which may be faced by Ecommerce such as adjustment of profit so not to fall  under the net of anti profiteering.

For further details w.r.t. GST and its Impact on your Ecommerce business, please contact us at 09958709189.


Popular posts from this blog

Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFC)

A Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) is a  company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of loans and advances, acquisition of shares stock/bonds/debentures/securities issued by Government or local authority or other securities of like marketable nature, leasing, hire-purchase, insurance business, chit business but does not include any institution whose principal business is that of agriculture activity, industrial activity, sale/purchase/construction of immovable property. A non-banking institution which is a company and which has its principal business of receiving deposits under any scheme or arrangement or any other manner, or lending in any manner is also a non-banking financial company (Residuary non-banking company). Advantages of NBFC a)it can provide loans and credit facilities, b)it can trade in  money market instruments c)it can do wealth management such as Managing portfolios of stocks and shares d)it can underwrite stock and shares and oth…

Nidhi Companies in India

This article enumerates the brief transaction procedure involved in the establishment of a Nidhi Company and the laws relating to Nidhi Company in force in India. It shall be noted that the activities described hereunder covers various relevant legislations, regulations and rules, for the time being in force in India and the legal entity has to obtain approval/register itself with Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”).
Preface In the Indian financial sector, Nidhi Company refers to any mutual benefit society notified by the MCA. They are created mainly for cultivating the habit of thrift and savings amongst its members. The amount of business conducted by Nidhi Companies is not as big as commercial banks or deposit taking Non-Banking Finance Companies. Nidhi Companies are highly localized and mostly single office institutions. They are also referred to as mutual benefit societies, because they accept deposits and give loans to only their own members; and membership is limited to individ…

Types of Companies under New Companies Act-2013

With new testament of Corporate law in force has introduced several different types of companies with special features.
ONE PERSON COMPANY (OPC) One Person Company is defined in Sub- Section 62 of Section 2 of The Companies Act, 2013, which reads as follows: 'One Person Company means a company which has only one member' It shall also be important to note that Section 3 classifies OPC as a Private Company for all the legal purposes with only one member. All the provisions related to the private company are applicable to an OPC, unless otherwise expressly excluded. ØOnly a natural person who is an Indian citizen and resident in India- üshall be eligible to incorporate a One Person Company; üshall be a nominee for the sole member of a One Person Company. ØNo person shall be eligible to incorporate more than a One Person Company or become nominee in more than one such company. ØNo minor shall become member or nominee of the One Person Company or can hold share with beneficial interest. ØT…

SEBI VS PACL: Trouble in Paradise

In its biggest-ever crackdown on a large-scale money pooling scheme estimated at nearly Rs. 50,000 crore (twice the amount to be recover from SAHARA group), regulator SEBI has ordered  Pearls Agrotech Corporation Limited (“PACL”) to refund investors within three months and wind up operations. SEBI had found PACL violating Collective Investment Scheme Regulations by mobilizing the money without being registered with the regulator, SEBI. Besides, closure of PACL operations, SEBI  is initiating further proceedings against PACL and its nine promoters and directors for fraudulent and unfair trade practices, as also for violation of SEBI's CIS Regulations, among others, as per a direction from the Supreme Court. At present, it is being estimated that PACL has more than 58.5 million customers, more than twice the 22 million demat accounts in the entire country and has paid commission of
Rs 7,893.8 crore up to March 2012  to more than its 8 lakh agents who works as network of chain system fo…

Nidhi Companies Rules 2014- An analysis w.r.t. Nidhi Company Registration

“Nidhi is a company formed with the exclusive object of cultivating the habit of thrift, savings and functioning for the mutual benefit of members by receiving deposits only from individuals enrolled as members and by lending only to individuals, also enrolled as members” -Section 406, Companies Act, 2013 & Companies Rules 2014
Nidhi Company are registered or formed only for the benefit for its members only, an outsider i.e. who is not the member of the Nidhi Company is not allowed to deposit any money or doing any kind of business with the concerned Nidhi Company. In this article we will analyze the impact of Nidhi Companies Rules 2014 on the registration of Nidhi Company Incorporation of Nidhi Company i)A Nidhi Company to be incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) shall be a public company and with a minimum paid up equity share capital of five lakh rupees; ii)On and after the commencement of Companies Act, 2013, no Nidhi Company shall issue preference shares; iii)Except as…

NBFC & Companies Act 2013 w.r.t. issue of Debentures

With the new testament of corporate law, Companies Act, 2013 to be effective from April 01, 2014, NBFC are facing lack of oxygen supply for their survival as to ensure that debenture issuances did not trespass into the domain of public deposits and were beginning to understand that optionally convertible debentures market will die out slowly that the rules have thrown language open to interpretation. Section 71 of the Companies Act, 2013 along with the rules implies that the debenture issuances have to be secured by specific moveable and immoveable properties. NBFCs may face a rocky time in finding these specific moveable and immoveable properties for issue of secured debenture.  Section 71 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that – 1.A company may issue debentures with an option to convert such debentures into shares, either wholly or partly at the time of redemption: Provided that the issue of debentures with an option to convert such debentures into shares, wholly or partly, shall be ap…


In Sahara Desert- Distress Hours Once upon a time, Sahara’s Subrarta Roy- a friend to all who came calling-whether a matinee idol in his 80s or a sports star in her teens, self bestowed title- “Sahara Shri”- the sponsor of the Indian cricket team and a group headed by a colourful, flamboyant CEO hobnobbing with Bollywood stars and cowbelt politicianscould boast of having friends in high places. Today in this distress hours, there seems to be few people who he can turn to in his hour of distress. For the sleepy Lucknow of the 1990s whose favourite past-time seemed to be reminiscing the city’s long gone glory days, Subrata Roy Sahara brought a cash of heavy bling and some more. Sahara has stayed afloat for more than 35 years despite repeated regulatory onslaughts. The first setback was in the late '90s when RBI slashed the discretionary investment powers of its finance firm. The next blow came in 2006 when its depository services firm had to be shut down. The big jolt came in 2008 whe…