In Sahara Desert- Distress Hours
Once
upon a time, Sahara’s Subrarta Roy- a friend to all who came calling-whether a
matinee idol in his 80s or a sports star in her teens, self bestowed title- “Sahara
Shri”- the sponsor of the Indian
cricket team and a group headed by a colourful, flamboyant CEO hobnobbing with
Bollywood stars and cowbelt politicians could boast of having friends in high places. Today in
this distress hours, there seems to be few people who he can turn to in his
hour of distress.
For
the sleepy Lucknow of the 1990s whose favourite past-time seemed to be reminiscing
the city’s long gone glory days, Subrata Roy Sahara brought a cash of heavy
bling and some more. Sahara has stayed afloat for more than 35 years despite
repeated regulatory onslaughts. The first setback was in the late '90s when RBI
slashed the discretionary investment powers of its finance firm. The next blow
came in 2006 when its depository services firm had to be shut down. The big
jolt came in 2008 when RBI left the finance company, the group's money-spinner,
with no choice but to wind down. But, soon Sahara advertised a mega township
venture spanning across cities. The absence of a regulator and spiralling
property prices had driven the foray into real estate.
The
high-profile saga -- which saw the arrest of flamboyant Sahara group chief
Subrata Roy, who calls himself "Managing Worker" of his business
empire -- has seen many dramatic events along the way including many emotional
pitches by Sahara group, which claims to have a networth of over INR 68,000
crore and assets worth over INR 1.5 lakh crore.
SEBI VS Sahara
The Sebi-Sahara case itself comprises
staggering numbers like collection of over Rs 24,000 crore from three crore
individuals. The case also has brought to headlines numerous financial jargons
like OFCDs, DRHP and RHP, as also numerous innocuous sounding names like
Kalawati, Hardwar and the famous 'Roshan Lal'.
Wayout:
Is there any way-out to regulate their
micro finance business/raising public deposits in real estate?? Though there
are not many legal options available, however, Sahara could have registered
their public raising schemes in real estate under Collective Investment Scheme with
SEBI. Perhaps, what many in Sahara did not realise was that circumstances were
turning against them. Also, there were cardinal mistakes by a group that often
operated in the regulatory twilight zone. A shadowy empire giving up closely
monitored financial services to slowly venture into real estate would not have
necessarily drawn the attention of unfriendly politicians and a no-nonsense SEBI.
Though it's a pity that more than a
million would lose their jobs if Sahara shrinks
In the recent past, SEBI has
discovered several entities such as Sahara, Rose Valley etc. been deployed to
raise capital from investors without following the prescribed regulatory
framework. To safeguard the interest of hapless investors and curb the
proliferation of unregulated schemes being operated, SEBI has brought under the
scope of the CIS Regulations all such schemes launched by any operator in any
field as long as they fell within the four corners of the definition of a CIS.
Recent amendments to the SEBI Act
provide more powers to SEBI for enforcement against unregistered pooling
vehicles. Under the amendments SEBI has been granted powers to regulate any
scheme or arrangement, if such scheme is not registered with SEBI, and involves
a corpus of INR 100 Crore (INR 1 billion) or more. This power can be viewed as
an attempt to limit any challenges from parties contending that a particular
fund raising activity is not covered under the purview of CIS Regulations
merely because it is not specifically covered under Section 11AA of the SEBI
Act. Further, SEBI has now been granted the authority to carry out search and
seizure operations and attach assets in case of non-compliance.
If
you are interested in further details and inclined to know the procedure
of CIS registration, click on the link below or contact us:
Thank you. That was really informative and a very helpful summary of the Sahara case.
ReplyDeleteDrama on the move since years, I haven't seen such case till date where a man is jailed even before proven guilty and a case where the allegators themself aren't able to prove themselves.
ReplyDelete@ankit- Supreme Court has the power to do so under Article 141 of the Constitutiion.....About prosecution, there is still confusion that whether SEBI has the entire case or any other authorities are also to be involved...
Deleteसवाल ये है कि कि आखिर सेबी अà¤ी तक गारंटी के 5 हजार करोड़ में से सिर्फ कुछ लाख ही क्यों वापस कर पाया क्या कोई पूछेगा?
ReplyDelete@Jignesh- Supreme Court has already asked the same question to SEBI about the status of refund to small investors and as usual SEBI has asked more time to reply back on the issue of time they requisite for distribution of funds to small investors.
Delete