Skip to main content

Revision in Interest rates of Micro Finance Institutions- Who will get benefit?

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide a notification on 7 February 2014 has made modification to the non-banking finance companies (NBFCs)- micro finance institutions (MFIs) directions with regard to pricing of credit whereby the earlier interest rate cap (As per the Malegam Committee recommendations, the interest rate cap on loans given by MFIs has been fixed at 26%) imposed on NBFC-MFIs was reviewed and modified.
The notification reviews and modifies the interest rates to be charged by NBFC-MFIs to its borrowers and will be calculated to be lower of the following:
a.     The cost of funds plus margin; or
b.     The average base rate of the five largest commercial banks by assets multiplied by 2.75

Further, RBI shall at the end of each quarter advice on the average of the
 base rates of the five largest commercial banks and shall determine the interest rates for the ensuing quarter.  The modification is to take effect from 1 April 2014.
The modification notification leads us to several tricky questions and the benefit this modification will pass to the borrowers.
What would be the impact on the lending interest rates?
If we had to consider the five largest banks by assets, State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Bank of India, Punjab National Bank and ICICI Bank, (assuming total assets, in absence of explicit mention in the notification), and find the 2.75x of the average base rate, it would come to 27.89% as on date. On the other hand, under the extant directions all NBFC-MFIs are required to maintain an aggregate margin cap of not more than 12% and the present average borrowing rate for NBFC-MFIs would be around 14-15% for smaller NBFC-MFIs and 12.5% for larger NBFC-MFIs.
Going by the RBI notification, the lower of the two interest rates would be as follows:
a.     For larger NBFC-MFIs, the two interest rates will be 24.5% and 27.89%, and the lower of the two would be 24.5%.
b.     For smaller NBFC-MFIs, the two interest rates will be 26.5% and 27.89% and the lower of the two would be 26.5%.
Looking at the current scenario, the modification will not have any impact on the on-going lending rates for NBFC-MFIs irrespective of the size.
However, with effect from 1April 2014 as per the RBI master circular , the margin caps may not exceed 10% for large MFIs (loans portfolios exceeding Rs100 crore) and 12% for others. For larger NBFC-MFIs this would still not have any impact as the lending rates for larger NBFC-MFIs for who the lending interest rates would 22.5% with a maximum 4% variation to 26.5% still lower than the average base rate multiplier.
However, going by the above analogy, smaller NBFC-MFIs will have an advantage in the current position as the margins may be relaxed a little. For the borrowers, this may not be good news on the interest rates charged to borrowers as the interest rates can be as high as 30.5%.
The chart below explains the multiple scenarios that may exist if the base rate was to vary:


Currently, it seems that this amendment will not have an impact of the lending rates as the
 borrowing costs plus margin is anyway lower than the average base rate multiplier. Only if the base rate average was to be around 8% or lower in case of systematically important companies or 9% and lower in case of other NBFC-MFIs would this modification pass the benefit of the lower interest rates to the borrowers from larger NBFC-MFIs. However if the base rate was to drop down it is highly unlikely that theborrowing costs for the NBFC-MFIs will not fall down. Also what is critical to note is that the pricing becomes unreasonably high with the higher base rates. So in effect this amendment is not achieving much in terms of passing benefit to the borrowers on practical grounds.
In essence, the average BLR-based pegging does actually nothing on a policy issue, borrowers paying 2.75 times the rate at which credit worthy borrowers pay seems like travesty of social justice or financial inclusion. The problem here is that the yield spread is not expressed as a parallel spread over BLR it is exponential since is X times. For instance, if base rates in the system become 12%, will MFI borrowers pay 33%?
There is no rationale in the multiple; it should have been nothing but a spread, which is parallel spread over BLR, even if it was to be pegged with BLR.
Will the amendment be effective for the existing loan portfolios?
The amendment is to come into effect from 1st April, 2014. While there is no explicit mention on the same, but it does not seem this amendment would have an impact on the existing portfolio. However any fresh lending by the NBFC-MFIs will have to comply by these amendments.
Where the interest rates are to be revised, will they be revised monthly, quarterly or annually?
Considering the fact that the NBFC-MFIs directions state that the average interest rate on loans during a financial year must not exceed the average borrowing cost during that financial year plus the margin, the pricing of the credit directions must be complied with on annual basis.
Further the average interest paid on borrowings and charged by MFIs are to be calculated on the average monthly balances of outstanding borrowings and loan portfolios respectively, and the 2.75x of average base rates will be announced quarterly, so MFIs will be able to vary the interest rates quarterly, where required. However practically, the auditors do a review of the compliance on a semi-annual basis for smaller NBFC-MFIs and quarterly basis for systematically important companies.
While the NBFC-MFIs may have to review the interest rates and borrowing costs on a quarterly basis, but practically it may not be possible to review the interest rates charged and revise the instalments. For NBFC-MFIs it may be a challenging task to explain the borrowers on any revision in the interest rates and bring that to effect. So the practical implementation of the modification is something, which will be put to test. Also in the tug of war of maintaining interest rates, the repayment history of the borrower, the credit worthiness of the borrower will become secondary considerations for charging interest rates.


Popular posts from this blog

Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFC)

A Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) is a  company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of loans and advances, acquisition of shares stock/bonds/debentures/securities issued by Government or local authority or other securities of like marketable nature, leasing, hire-purchase, insurance business, chit business but does not include any institution whose principal business is that of agriculture activity, industrial activity, sale/purchase/construction of immovable property. A non-banking institution which is a company and which has its principal business of receiving deposits under any scheme or arrangement or any other manner, or lending in any manner is also a non-banking financial company (Residuary non-banking company). Advantages of NBFC a)it can provide loans and credit facilities, b)it can trade in  money market instruments c)it can do wealth management such as Managing portfolios of stocks and shares d)it can underwrite stock and shares and oth…

Nidhi Companies in India

This article enumerates the brief transaction procedure involved in the establishment of a Nidhi Company and the laws relating to Nidhi Company in force in India. It shall be noted that the activities described hereunder covers various relevant legislations, regulations and rules, for the time being in force in India and the legal entity has to obtain approval/register itself with Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”).
Preface In the Indian financial sector, Nidhi Company refers to any mutual benefit society notified by the MCA. They are created mainly for cultivating the habit of thrift and savings amongst its members. The amount of business conducted by Nidhi Companies is not as big as commercial banks or deposit taking Non-Banking Finance Companies. Nidhi Companies are highly localized and mostly single office institutions. They are also referred to as mutual benefit societies, because they accept deposits and give loans to only their own members; and membership is limited to individ…

Types of Companies under New Companies Act-2013

With new testament of Corporate law in force has introduced several different types of companies with special features.
ONE PERSON COMPANY (OPC) One Person Company is defined in Sub- Section 62 of Section 2 of The Companies Act, 2013, which reads as follows: 'One Person Company means a company which has only one member' It shall also be important to note that Section 3 classifies OPC as a Private Company for all the legal purposes with only one member. All the provisions related to the private company are applicable to an OPC, unless otherwise expressly excluded. ØOnly a natural person who is an Indian citizen and resident in India- üshall be eligible to incorporate a One Person Company; üshall be a nominee for the sole member of a One Person Company. ØNo person shall be eligible to incorporate more than a One Person Company or become nominee in more than one such company. ØNo minor shall become member or nominee of the One Person Company or can hold share with beneficial interest. ØT…

SEBI VS PACL: Trouble in Paradise

In its biggest-ever crackdown on a large-scale money pooling scheme estimated at nearly Rs. 50,000 crore (twice the amount to be recover from SAHARA group), regulator SEBI has ordered  Pearls Agrotech Corporation Limited (“PACL”) to refund investors within three months and wind up operations. SEBI had found PACL violating Collective Investment Scheme Regulations by mobilizing the money without being registered with the regulator, SEBI. Besides, closure of PACL operations, SEBI  is initiating further proceedings against PACL and its nine promoters and directors for fraudulent and unfair trade practices, as also for violation of SEBI's CIS Regulations, among others, as per a direction from the Supreme Court. At present, it is being estimated that PACL has more than 58.5 million customers, more than twice the 22 million demat accounts in the entire country and has paid commission of
Rs 7,893.8 crore up to March 2012  to more than its 8 lakh agents who works as network of chain system fo…

Nidhi Companies Rules 2014- An analysis w.r.t. Nidhi Company Registration

“Nidhi is a company formed with the exclusive object of cultivating the habit of thrift, savings and functioning for the mutual benefit of members by receiving deposits only from individuals enrolled as members and by lending only to individuals, also enrolled as members” -Section 406, Companies Act, 2013 & Companies Rules 2014
Nidhi Company are registered or formed only for the benefit for its members only, an outsider i.e. who is not the member of the Nidhi Company is not allowed to deposit any money or doing any kind of business with the concerned Nidhi Company. In this article we will analyze the impact of Nidhi Companies Rules 2014 on the registration of Nidhi Company Incorporation of Nidhi Company i)A Nidhi Company to be incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) shall be a public company and with a minimum paid up equity share capital of five lakh rupees; ii)On and after the commencement of Companies Act, 2013, no Nidhi Company shall issue preference shares; iii)Except as…

NBFC & Companies Act 2013 w.r.t. issue of Debentures

With the new testament of corporate law, Companies Act, 2013 to be effective from April 01, 2014, NBFC are facing lack of oxygen supply for their survival as to ensure that debenture issuances did not trespass into the domain of public deposits and were beginning to understand that optionally convertible debentures market will die out slowly that the rules have thrown language open to interpretation. Section 71 of the Companies Act, 2013 along with the rules implies that the debenture issuances have to be secured by specific moveable and immoveable properties. NBFCs may face a rocky time in finding these specific moveable and immoveable properties for issue of secured debenture.  Section 71 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that – 1.A company may issue debentures with an option to convert such debentures into shares, either wholly or partly at the time of redemption: Provided that the issue of debentures with an option to convert such debentures into shares, wholly or partly, shall be ap…


In Sahara Desert- Distress Hours Once upon a time, Sahara’s Subrarta Roy- a friend to all who came calling-whether a matinee idol in his 80s or a sports star in her teens, self bestowed title- “Sahara Shri”- the sponsor of the Indian cricket team and a group headed by a colourful, flamboyant CEO hobnobbing with Bollywood stars and cowbelt politicianscould boast of having friends in high places. Today in this distress hours, there seems to be few people who he can turn to in his hour of distress. For the sleepy Lucknow of the 1990s whose favourite past-time seemed to be reminiscing the city’s long gone glory days, Subrata Roy Sahara brought a cash of heavy bling and some more. Sahara has stayed afloat for more than 35 years despite repeated regulatory onslaughts. The first setback was in the late '90s when RBI slashed the discretionary investment powers of its finance firm. The next blow came in 2006 when its depository services firm had to be shut down. The big jolt came in 2008 whe…