Skip to main content

Collective Investment Scheme

For the last few years, Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), the Indian securities regulator, has intensified its scrutiny of investment structures that raise domestic capital on an unregulated basis. It shall be noted that the Collective Investment Scheme (“CIS”) activities hereunder covers various relevant legislations, regulations and rules, for the time being in force in India and the legal entity has to obtain approval/register itself with SEBI as a Collective Investment Management Committee (“CIMC”) to be able to launch a CIS.
In last few years, SEBI has intensified its scrutiny of investment structures that raise domestic capital on an unregulated basis wherein various entities garner funds through fraudulent investment schemes with promise of huge returns mainly in the name of property development and agriculture.
 Securities Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter the “SAT”) recently passed an order upholding SEBI’s findings against Alchemist Infra Reality Limited. The SAT order along with recent pronouncement by the Supreme Court have probed unregulated investment arrangements to conclude whether or not they constitute CIS, as Schemes are required to be registered with SEBI in pursuance to Securities And Exchange Board Of India (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulation”).

SEBI Action against Defaulting Companies
(i)         As per SEBI’s latest data, around 664 entities collected INR 3,518 crores in 1998-99.
Ø   Among these 75 companies wound up their schemes and returned money to investors.
Ø   Prosecution action has been launched against remaining 589 entities.
(ii)        As on March 31, 2013, there were 171 CIMCs still operating without SEBI approval against whom court proceedings have been initiated.
Ø   Penalty imposed in such from INR 30,000/- to INR 10,00,000/- (depending upon the money mobilized in contravention of the Regulation.
Ø   Rigorous imprisonment for promoters and associates of upto 6 months.
(iii)       Various courts in the country slapped convictions in 14 cases related to illegal CIS in fiscal year 2012-13, taking the total of such verdicts to 138.
Update on certain cases relating to illegal CIS
(i)         Maitreya Services Private Limited – SEBI issued an order in March 2013 against this company in March 2013 directing to wind up its CIS and refund the money to its subscribers.
Ø   SEBI barred the company and its directors from the securities market till the time all its CIS were wound up and decided to initiate prosecution proceedings against them.
Ø   Charges like offences of fraud, cheating, criminal breach of trust and misappropriation of public funds have been filed.
Ø   Securities Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “SAT”) upheld the SEBI order against SAT
(ii)        Alchemist Infra Realty Limited - The Company accepted contribution from investors for collective utilization and pooled the investment with the object of carrying out the overall scheme/ arrangement because the Company had the discretion to allot such area in its project as it considered appropriate. Further, under a conveyance deed the area of plot for each individual was denoted as ‘proportionate undivided interest’. The purchaser was thus not entitled to claim division and/or partition of the said proportionate undivided interest. The purchasers could not either interfere with the working, managing, controlling and supervising of the said plot in any manner whatsoever.
Ø   This in SEBI’s view, were not limbs of a buy-sell arrangement, but a pooling of money pursuant to a scheme or arrangement.
Ø   Based on these findings, SEBI concluded that the company’s activity were in the nature of a CIMC and held it to be in violation of the Regulation as the company didn’t have the requite approvals from SEBI.
Ø   SEBI accordingly passed directions to the Company and its directors to wind up the existing Scheme and further ordered the Company to refund all the collected money.
Ø   SAT confirmed SEBI’s finding and upheld the SEBI order under appeal which was made by the Company and its directors, by adopting the reasoning similar to that provided by SEBI in the SEBI order.

Collective Investment Scheme or CIS
CIS is defined in Section 11AA of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) as per which CIS is any scheme made or offered by a company under which –
(i)         Contribution made by individuals are pooled and utilized solely for a common scheme or arrangement;
(ii)        Contributions and payments made by individuals with a view to receive profits, income, produce or property, whether movable or immovable from such scheme or arrangement;
(iii)       Property, contribution or investment forming part of scheme or arrangement, whether identifiable or not, is managed on behalf of the investors; and
(iv)      Investors do not have day to day control over the management and operation of the scheme or arrangement.

Exclusions to CIS
There are many types of schemes and arrangements to collect funds from individuals which has been excluded by SEBI from the definition of CIS. CIS will not include schemes and arrangement –
(i)         Offered by Co-operative Societies or societies registered under any state or central act;
(ii)        Offered by Non-Banking Financial Companies to accept deposits;
(iii)       Contract of insurance to which Insurance Act applies;
(iv)      Providing for pension or insurance schemes under Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952;
(v)       Under which deposits are accepted under Section 58A of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi)      Under which deposits are accepted by a company declared as a Nidhi or a mutual benefit society under section 620A of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vii)     falling within the meaning of Chit business as defined in clause (d) of section 2of the Chit Fund Act, 1982; and
(viii)    Under which contributions made are in the nature of subscription to a mutual fund.
  
Collective Investment Management Company or CIMC
As per the Regulation no other entity other than a CIMC registered with SEBI can launch a CIS. The eligibility criteria for an entity to be granted SEBI approval for operating as a CIMC are as follows:-
(i)         Registered as a company under the Companies Act, 1956;
(ii)        Memorandum of Association specifies managing of CIS as one of its main objectives;
(iii)       Net worth of not less INR 5 crores, provided at time of making application the net worth can be INR 3 crores which is to be increased by applicant to INR 5 crores within three years of date of registration as a CIMC;
(iv)      Fit and proper person for grant of such certificate;
(v)       Has adequate infrastructure to enable it to operate CIS in accordance with the provision of these regulations;
(vi)      Directors or key personnel shall have relevant experience and have not been convicted for an offence involving moral turpitude or for any economic offence or for the violation of any securities laws;
(vii)     At least 50 percent of the directors are independent;
(viii)    No person directly or indirectly related to the applicant entity has been refused registration by SEBI under the Act; and
(ix)      At least one director not subject to retirement is representative of the trustee.

For further details w.r.t.setting up of CIMC/CIS, please click on the link below:




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PSARA License: To Start a Private Security Agency Business in India

Private Security Agency business is one of the most sought and rapid growing business in India with huge demand and potential. Due to ever evolving demand for private security by industry & business segments, the Private Security Agency business is growing for more than 20% and there is still huge untapped market still wide open for the future ventures. Today in any and every aspect, private security has an important role to play, whether its transfer of cash to ATM, transportation of valuables or protection to key members of business conglomerates. Any Private Security Agency cannot commence its business and operations in India without procurement of license under Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005 also known as PSARA License . PSARA License is obtained state wise & is valid for 5 years and had to be renewed after every 5 years. The government fees for PSARA License is as following: 1.        For one (1) District- Rs. 5,...

Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFC)

A Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) is a  company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of loans and advances, acquisition of shares stock/bonds/debentures/securities issued by Government or local authority or other securities of like marketable nature, leasing, hire-purchase, insurance business, chit business but does not include any institution whose principal business is that of agriculture activity, industrial activity, sale/purchase/construction of immovable property. A non-banking institution which is a company and which has its principal business of receiving deposits under any scheme or arrangement or any other manner, or lending in any manner is also a non-banking financial company (Residuary non-banking company). Advantages of NBFC a)       it can provide loans and credit facilities, b)       it can trade in  money market instruments c)       it...

Types of Companies under New Companies Act-2013

With new testament of Corporate law in force has introduced several different types of companies with special features. ONE PERSON COMPANY (OPC) One Person Company is defined in Sub- Section 62 of Section 2 of The Companies Act, 2013, which reads as follows: 'One Person Company means a company which has only one member' It shall also be important to note that Section 3 classifies OPC as a Private Company for all the legal purposes with only one member. All the provisions related to the private company are applicable to an OPC, unless otherwise expressly excluded. Ø   Only a natural person who is an Indian citizen and resident in India- ü   shall be eligible to incorporate a One Person Company; ü   shall be a nominee for the sole member of a One Person Company. Ø   No person shall be eligible to incorporate more than a One Person Company or become nominee in more than one such company. Ø   No minor shall become member or nominee of the One...

Investment Frauds by Investment Advisers

Today driven by the promise of higher returns than the saving accounts or fixed deposits, most of the small and retail investors are moving their investments under the guidance of Investment Advisers. “ Investment Advisers ” means any person, who for consideration, is engaged in the business of providing investment advice to clients or other persons or group of persons and includes any person who holds out himself as an investment adviser, by whatever name called. Investment Advisers who make public appearance or make recommendations or offer an opinion concerning securities or public offers through public media while making recommendations through public media are required to comply with the relevant applicable laws. What is an Investment Advice: - “ Investment Advice”  is an advice relating to investing in, purchasing, selling or otherwise dealing in securities or investment products, and advice on investment portfolio containing securities or investment products, whet...

NCLT has Exclusive Jurisdiction for all the Company Matters

In deciding an appeal in the matter of MAIF Investment India PTE Ltd. v/s Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited & Ors ., Company Appeal (AT) No. 334 of 2018, NCLAT has reviewed and decided on the issue of exclusive jurisdiction of NCLT in all the company matters and to bar the jurisdiction of civil courts including   complex and contentious one. The appeal was against the order given by NCLT, Hyderabad, where the NCLT, Hyderabad bench declined to entertain the petition under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 for seeking a rectification in the register of members. The alleged dispute involved conversion of compulsory convertible debentures without requisite consent and quorum. NCLT, Hyderabad dismissed the petition stating the reason that issue raised were complex or contentious issue which required the examination of the Arbitration Act, 1996 & Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. While dismissing the petition, NCLT, Hyderabad had relied on Supreme Court’s 1998 j...

Legal Obligations of Technology Service Providers as Intermediaries

A database of millions of customers including their contact details are found freely accessible online and are available for sale at a very nominal price at various online social media platforms has brought a serious and basic question in focus- who all can be held responsible and accountable for such unauthorize and illegal acts? Prima facie , the person who is selling the database is responsible under the eyes of law, but do the technology services providers or the platform where such database is been listed, owes any obligation to the customers and can be held responsible for unauthorize acts by a third party on their platform? The technology service providers or the online platform operators are commonly known as “ Intermediaries ”. In India, these technology service providers or Intermediaries are governed by the provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000 (“ IT Act ”) along with Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011 (“ Intermediary Rules ”) ...

Nidhi Companies in India

This article enumerates the brief transaction procedure involved in the establishment of a Nidhi Company and the laws relating to Nidhi Company in force in India. It shall be noted that the activities described hereunder covers various relevant legislations, regulations and rules, for the time being in force in India and the legal entity has to obtain approval/register itself with Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“ MCA ”). Preface In the Indian financial sector, Nidhi Company refers to any mutual benefit society notified by the MCA. They are created mainly for cultivating the habit of thrift and savings amongst its members. The amount of business conducted by Nidhi Companies is not as big as commercial banks or deposit taking Non-Banking Finance Companies. Nidhi Companies are highly localized and mostly single office institutions. They are also referred to as mutual benefit societies, because they accept deposits and give loans to only their own members; and membership is limited...